On March 24, 2022 a Party Statement was filed involving a dispute between Araujo Tavares, Antonia Marcelia , and for Joint Petition in the District Court of Worcester County.
Preview
Commonwealth of Massachusetts — The Trial Court Division Worcester 4 Se Probate and Family Court Department Docket No. TLDS AFFIDAVIT OF IRRETRIEVABLE BREAKDOWN Antonia Marcelia Araujo Tavares Petitioner Fl LED v. WAR 2 4 2022 Eduardo Da Silva Canto CBL Petitioner Petitioners state that our marriage has suffered an irretrievable breakdown which began on or about 03/08/2021 (Datey . In particular, our marriage has suffered an irretrievable breakdown because: During our marriage we each developed different expectations about the purpose and meaning of our marriage, so that we no longer share any common goals to be attained in our marriage. As a result, our marriage has suffered an irretrievable breakdown as evidenced by a lack of meaningful communication. We agree that reconciliation is not possible. Signed under the penalties of perjury. pate _QB-//- 7922 . PETITIONER PETITIONER Glitlo < CGP- “ (Signature) Eduardo Da Silva Canto (Please Print) (Please Print) 8 Senate Rd. #12 19 Green St. #5 (Sireet address) (Sireet address) Milford, MA 01757 Milford, MA 01757 (Ciy/Towny Siatey @ipy (CiyrTowny tate ipy ROSCIANE FISHER NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires, May 27, 2027
Sep 13, 2024 | DR Custody, Support, and Parenting Time | IV-D Complaint for Support filed by IV-D Agency | WO24D1952CS
DATE: 09/06/24 TIME: 9:00 A.M. DEPT: D CASE NO: FL0001091 PRESIDING: HON. BETH S. JORDAN REPORTER: CLERK: STACY BOND. PETITIONER: DIANA ROQUE CARDONA and RESPONDENT: ALEXANDER MANSFIELD NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: REQUEST FOR ORDER — CHILD CUSTODY/VISITATION RULING This matter is set for hearing on Respondent/Father’s 7/17/24 Request for Order (“RFO”) to modify child custody/visitation with respect to the parties’ daughter, Izabella (“Izzy” DOB S-25- 18). Mother filed her Responsive Declaration on 8/26/24 opposing Father’s requests. The parties met separately with Family Court Services (“FCS”) on 8/22/24, and FCS filed their Report & Recommendations with the Court on 8/29/24. The current custody orders were made in Sonoma County on 2/22/21 and award sole legal and physical custody of Izabella to Petitioner/Mother, with Father having visits with Izabella every Tuesday from 2:30 to 7:30 and every Friday from 3:00 pm through Saturday at 3:00 pm. There is a history of involvement with Children and Family Services. Father is seeking joint physical and legal custody of Izzy; he states that when the custody order was made, the parties intended to marry and be a family, but circumstances have changed, and he has struggled with visitations and communications with Mother. He has not seen Izzy since May of 2023. Mother states that she has been in therapy and working with the Center for Domestic Peace since the beginning of 2020, and that Izzy has been traumatized by Father and has received therapy for the last year as a result. Mother further states that she has tried to work with Father to visit with Izzy, but Father refused to accept her boundaries, has harassed her, verbally abused her and showed up at her house uninvited. This creates additional trauma and tension for her and Izzy. The Court notes that, although Mother attempted to get a restraining order against Father, the request was denied by the Sonoma County Court. After consideration of the parties’ pleadings, as well as the FCS Report & Recommendations, the Court finds that it is in the best interests of Izzy to adopt the recommendations of FCS, as modified below: ieee FL0001091 Parental Responsibilities: Mother shall continue to have sole legal custody of Izabella. Mother shall make decisions about matters concerning Izabella’s health, education and welfare. However, both parents shall have access to Izabella’s school, medical, mental health, and dental records and the right to consult with professionals who are providing services to her. 2. Mother shall continue to have sole physical custody of Izabella. Timeshare Schedule 3. Izabella shall continue to live with Mother and she shall have professionally supervised visits with Father through Rally one time each week for up to one hour. Collateral Issues 4. Izabella shall continue in therapy and all recommendations by her therapist shall be followed. The parents shall engage in peaceful contact only in the presence of Izabella. Izabella shall not be exposed to any verbal or physical abuse. Neither parent shall make any disparaging comments about the other parent in the presence of Izabella, or allow others to do so. SO ORDERED. The Court will prepare the Order per Rule 5.125, California Rules of Court TEMPORARILY, under current orders, litigants who require the assistance of a Spanish language interpreter shall appear in person. Interpreter services via video technology are currently not available. Any party contesting the ruling and requesting oral argument shall appear in person or remotely through Zoom either by video or telephone. Please follow the guidelines set forth on the court website at www.marin.courts.ca.gov The Zoom appearance information is as follows: September 2024 at 09:00 AM Join Zoom Meeting Zoom link for Courtroom D Family Law 161 0592888 passcode 841800 Meeting ID: 161 059 2888 Passcode: 841800 Page 2 of 3 FL0001091 If you are only able to appear by phone you may dial the phone number below, follow the prompts and enter the meeting ID and passcode. +1-669-254-5252 US (San Jose) Meeting ID: 161 059 2888 Passcode: 841800 If a party and/or counsel elects to appear over Zoom they must follow proper Zoom etiquette. This includes joining the call five minutes early, speaking only one at a time, avoiding disruptions, and wearing proper attire appropriate for a court environment. Parties must act and speak in a professional and respectful manner as though they are in an actual courtroom. If a party or counsel is unable to follow proper Zoom etiquette, the court may halt the hearing and order the parties to return in person. Page 3 of 3 RES RS SSS SC
Case Number: 24STCP01553 Hearing Date: September 9, 2024 Dept: 9 Petitioner must double check the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree. If Petitioner is satisfied with the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree, NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. If the new name is not clearly written and correctly spelled on the proposed decree, Petitioner must appear at the6hearing to submit a corrected proposed decree. The petition is granted. A copy of the signed decree will be available in Room 112 of the Clerk's Office seven days after the date of the hearing. Once the proposed decree is signed, it cannot be amended without a new petition to change name.
Case Number: 24STCP02163 Hearing Date: September 9, 2024 Dept: 9 Petitioner must double check the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree. If Petitioner is satisfied with the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree, NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. If the new name is not clearly written and correctly spelled on the proposed decree, Petitioner must appear at the6hearing to submit a corrected proposed decree. The petition is granted. A copy of the signed decree will be available in Room 112 of the Clerk's Office seven days after the date of the hearing. Once the proposed decree is signed, it cannot be amended without a new petition to change name.
DATE: 09/04/24 TIME: 9:00 A.M. DEPT: B CASE NO: FL0000636 PRESIDING: COM. JANET L. FRANKEL REPORTER: CLERK: ALEX URTON PETITIONER: MILER LILLIA TORRES and RESPONDENT: JULIO CESAR CASTILLO NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: REQUEST FOR ORDER — CHILD/SPOUSAL SUPPORT/VISITATION; PROPERTY CONTROL; TEMPORARY SPOUSAL SUPPORT RULING This matter comes before the court on Petitioner/Mother Request for Order (RFO) filed July 9, 2024, seeking child custody, child visitation, child support, temporary spousal support, property control, and attorney’s fees. CUSTODY AND VISITATION - RESOLVED BY AGREEMENT The parents met with Family Court Services child recommending mediation counselors and reached agreements regarding custody and visitation of their minor child, Santiago, born September 19, 2008, on August 7, 2024. Those agreements were filed with the court on August 19, 2024. PROPERTY CONTROL Mother seeks exclusive use of the family residence at 1600 Hotchkin Drive in Novato. Mother asserts that the parties separated in December 2015, and Mother has continued to reside in the family residence, paying the house bills and expenses (carrying costs). Father lives in Vallejo and does not oppose Mother’s request for exclusive use if she pays the carrying costs. The court grants Mother’s request for exclusive use of the family residence, at 1600 Hotchkin Drive, Novato. The court further orders Mother to pay the carrying costs for the family residence pending further court order. The court reserves jurisdiction over all claims for reimbursements, charges, or credits related to the family residence. CHILD SUPPORT / PENDENTE LITE SPOUSAL SUPPORT / ATTORNEY’S FEES Mother seeks child support and pendente lite spousal support pursuant to guideline, and attorney’s fees. Mother’s RFO requests $7,500 in attorney’s fees (see page 4 of 4). Mother’s attorney’s declaration in support of Mother’s request seeks $10,000 in attorney’s fees. SRE a ESS SS FL0000636 In her income and expense declaration, Mother asserts that her income from employment (salary plus commissions/overtime) averages $5,645 per month, plus an average of $87 per month from state disability. She states she pays $75 per month in union dues. She claims $4,110 per month in expenses, including the mortgage on the family residence in the amount of $2,130 per month. Mother does not provide any paystubs, tax returns, or other documents to support her income and expense declaration, as required by the local rules. The court notes that Father did submit a copy of Mother’s 2023 tax return, which tells a different story regarding Mother’s monthly income. Mother’s request for child support, spousal support, and attorney’s fees is denied, without prejudice, due to Mother’s failure to comply with MCR Fam 7.13. Counsel for Father shall prepare the formal order after hearing. TEMPORARILY, UNDER CURRENT ORDERS, LITIGANTS WHO REQUIRE THE ASSISTANCE OF A SPANISH LANGUAGE INTERPRETER ARE REQUIRED TO APPEAR IN PERSON. INTERPRETER SERVICES FOR PERSONS APPEARING VIA ZOOM ARE NOT AVAILABLE. Any party contesting the ruling and requesting oral argument shall appear in person or remotely through Zoom either by video or telephone. Please follow the guidelines set forth on the court website at www.marin.courts.ca.gov The Zoom appearance information is as follows: September 2024, 9:00 a.m. Join Zoom Meeting Attps:/marin-courts-ca- gov.zoomgoy.com/j/1610592888? pwa=bDZNRVpPOy9SUGhTZEpFMONAMnZJdz09 Meeting ID: 161 241 5928 Passcode: 997712 If you are only able to appear by phone you may dial the phone number below, follow the prompts and enter the meeting ID and passcode. +1-669-254-5252 US (San Jose) Meeting ID: 161 241 5928 Passcode: 997712 If a party and/or counsel elects to appear over Zoom they must follow proper Zoom etiquette. This includes joining the call five minutes early, speaking only one at a time, avoiding disruptions, and wearing proper attire appropriate for a court environment. Parties must act and speak in a professional and respectful manner as though they are in an actual courtroom. If a party or counsel is unable to follow proper Zoom etiquette, the court may halt the hearing and order the parties to return in person. Page 2 of 2 a
No appearances necessary. This matter awaits entry of judgment following the parties’ stipulated agreement on July 24, 2024. The matter is continued for further case management to December 4, 2024 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. If judgment is entered prior to this date, the CMC hearing will be vacated.
22FL46036 BARGE v BARGE The Complaint and Summons have been properly served and there has been no response. The petitioner is directed to have an answer, default or dismissal on file prior to the next Case Management Conference scheduled for January 22, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. in Dept. 4.
24CV02665 In re: Carmack, Jenna Renee EVENT: Change of Name (Adult) The Court will hear from Petitioner.
Case Number: 24STCP02192 Hearing Date: September 9, 2024 Dept: 9 Petitioner must double check the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree. If Petitioner is satisfied with the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree, NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. If the new name is not clearly written and correctly spelled on the proposed decree, Petitioner must appear at the6hearing to submit a corrected proposed decree. The petition is granted. A copy of the signed decree will be available in Room 112 of the Clerk's Office seven days after the date of the hearing. Once the proposed decree is signed, it cannot be amended without a new petition to change name.